In a school inspection initiated by the educational conference dealt with the conceptual development of the training space program. The few, to implement change-oriented, ladies and gentlemen were considering in the exercise room more social activities or therapeutic elements. This was at the end of the conference, however, irritated by the acting head teacher swept off the table. You did not say from the outset, we must implement the existing rules only logical. My supervisee, who here on the instructions of the leadership council had to take, had no choice but to identify some key points that should be taken to the next four weeks in particular. One of these points was to have been delivered to the student with "briefing note" which contains a clear mandate for the gym-teacher. A second was held in the gym that only reflections behavior under this program should be. One of the more confrontational occurring convinced colleagues brought my supervisees, who briefly had to exercise room service, one of her students, no admission form. The sole job to the boys was to stand for forty minutes on a pink blotting paper. This was monitored. When the teacher had left the room, the vice-principal asked the boy to sit down. He used the hour to talk to him about his problematic school career and about his family difficulties. At the end of the students said: "Such a conversation has led here at the school, no one with me. We also think when I came here, one here would help. I think not to say that one is helping here. For most, it is here, but worse. "
How do you evaluate the event from a scientific point of view childhood? Develop approaches for a discussion of this school.
